{"id":4215,"date":"2021-07-21T17:54:55","date_gmt":"2021-07-21T17:54:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/expatkaliningrad.com\/?p=4215"},"modified":"2024-03-29T20:23:55","modified_gmt":"2024-03-29T18:23:55","slug":"its-curtains-for-the-house-of-soviets","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/expatkaliningrad.com\/ru\/its-curtains-for-the-house-of-soviets\/","title":{"rendered":"Its Curtains for the House of Soviets"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

The Soviets never got their house in order, but will a lesson emerge from the past<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Updated 29 March 2024 | First published: 21 July 2021~ Its Curtains for the House of Soviets<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is official: 51 years after its construction and the same number of years of non-occupation, arguably one of Kaliningrad\u2019s most iconic buildings, and ironically one of its most lambasted, especially by the western press, is about to be demolished. I am, of course, referring to the House of Soviets, ninety per cent of which was completed in 1985 on a site close to where once stood the magnificent K\u00f6nigsberg Castle, the East Prussian city\u2019s jewel in the crown, which was extensively damaged in the Second World War and then, in 1967, dynamited into oblivion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rumour has it that the House of Soviets was regrettably erected on top of a labyrinth of subterranean tunnels connected to K\u00f6nigsberg Castle which rendered the structure unsafe, from whence came the folk story that the concrete behemoth was doomed from day one, never to be completed, never to be occupied, cursed by an act of celestial sabotage bent on avenging K\u00f6nigsberg’s fate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Personally speaking, the House of Soviets was the first building to attract my attention and the one that imprinted itself on my memory when I arrived in Kaliningrad for the first time in winter 2000. I do not believe that it had anything to do with the avenging shadow of Teutonicism, but that it was rendered more significant and considerably more memorable by virtue of its epithetic pathos. As a statement it was one that would have been better had it never been made. At best it was a back-handed compliment and at worst a symbolic fiasco, for, in spite of its formidable name, it never was the House of Soviets, in fact quite the opposite, and would  have been more aptly called the House Where No Soviets Were or the House Where the Soviets Ought to Have Been or, well, you get the picture \u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Like many who live in Kaliningrad, my feelings for the House Conspicuous for The Soviet\u2019s Absence are ambivalent. By any stretch of the imagination, the building is not a pretty sight, but it is very much of its time. Similar structures in the UK, hailed in the 1960s as a new dawn in architectural design, have mostly gone the way the House of Soviets is going, although a handful won reprieve from the demolition hitmen by forging themselves a new identity through the listed buildings\u2019 honours and have since become a footnote in Forgets Guide to the Architecturalocracy<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There are some in Kaliningrad who believe that the House of Soviets deserves similar status, that it is iconic enough to be preserved, but the official view is that restoring the house, which is a hundred times bigger than any house that I have ever seen (perhaps the Soviets got lost in there), is a far too costly enterprise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The House of Soviets’ problem \u2014 what should be done about it and what should become of it \u2014 has been the subject of ardent debate for many years, as has been what should replace it. The cultural-heritage lobby has never had any doubts: the House of Soviets borders on hallowed land. It is right on the doorstep of K\u00f6nigsberg Castle, or rather where K\u00f6nigsberg Castle formerly stood, and this group, which allegedly boasts notable architects among its membership, holds firmly to the opinion that that any regeneration project destined for this patch should pay homage to the cultural and the architectural significance of all that has gone before, and this includes, but is not restricted to, pundits who are of the unswayable opinion that nothing less than the reconstruction of K\u00f6nigsberg Castle will suffice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Understanding the negative answer as to why K\u00f6nigsberg Castle cannot be reconstructed requires a lot more insight into large-scale building projects than the romantic desire to have it rebuilt. Like you, I gain great satisfaction from architect\u2019s drawings, scale models and, nowadays, the ubiquitous computer-generated 3-D virtual tour, but what do I know about the real nitty gritty \u2014 about materials, logistics, the ins and outs of engineering and, most importantly, expense?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I appreciate that should K\u00f6nigsberg Castle or part thereof be reconstructed that the international community would be obliged to rethink Kaliningrad, to review it not for its over publicised fixation on military might but as a showcase to the world of the highest cultural, historical and architectural values, and that any design programme forward-thinking enough to incorporate features from the castle could not help but be held in the highest esteem by architects, city planning departments, civic leaders, politicians and socio-cultural historians throughout the world. Not a bad thing, you have to admit, for a place that has had to endure a recent lifetime of negative press, propaganda and impolitic criticism. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

So, has the moment been lost forever? Is Kaliningrad standing at the crossroads of its destiny yet again, and are those people to whom its destiny is entrusted going to steam it on down the highway that leads to fame, honour and fortune or put it into a barrow and wheel it down a side road?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Whilst the House of Soviets stood \u2026 and stood, and stood, and stood \u2026 its fate undecided, and whilst the debates of what should and should not be done reamed on inconclusively, conservationists, historians and culture-conscious lobbyists nurtured a ray of hope that shone, if not as brightly as they would have liked, at least with some conceivable lustre. Hope, after all, dies last, they say.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But even Hope is not immortal. The fate of the House of Soviets, which hung in the balance for so many years, has finally been decided, not only with respect to it coming down but also with regard to the nature of its replacement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Exit stage left the House of Soviets; enter stage right controversy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It’s Curtains for the House of Soviets<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

As I understand it, the days of debate are ended. Various regeneration plans were invited and submitted for what will effectively become, when the curtain falls on the House of Soviets, Kaliningrad\u2019s new city centre, and one of the plans has been chosen. The problem is, however, that the Chosen One, is not everybody\u2019s choice. The plans have, to coin a phrase, received a mixed reception, both from Kaliningrad\u2019s Joe Publicskee and a handful of Russia\u2019s respected architects. But isn\u2019t this par for the course, you ask? Whenever has it been possible to please all of the people all of the time?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At the end of the day, whether it is a city redevelopment project or putting up a garden shed, people will take sides. Heels dig in, opponents pull and tug from their respective corners and opinions harden and grow more vituperative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I do not have to voice where my allegiance lies, because I am an old fart who lives in the past and rarely likes to come out of it. But if you are one of those who are sorely disappointed by what they propose to build on the grave of K\u00f6nigsberg Castle and the haunted House of Soviets, the best advice I have for you is learn to time travel as I have done!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Allow me to elucidate with a word (not the last one, I hope) from the Hope Dies Last Society: \u201cJust because they are not going to reconstruct K\u00f6nigsberg Castle in 2021 does not mean that they never will. 2021 is a small part of the ever-changing present; it isn\u2019t something written in stone.\u201d You see, the beauty of time travel is that not only can you go backwards but you also get to flirt a little with the secrets of the future!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Take England\u2019s King Richard III, for example, who never listened to me. This great and majestic nobleman who was known for centuries as the lost king, eventually turned up, or rather was turned up, in, of all places, Asian Leicester. Where exactly?  Under a city carpark! Had anybody told King Richard III whilst he was alive that he would end up under a carpark in predominantly Asian Leicester, he would, having executed the person first who dared to suggest such a terrible thing ~ Leicester of all places!! ~ most assuredly have avowed \u201cNever!\u201d And, of course, he would have been wrong! <\/p>\n\n\n\n

So, never ever say never! Only time will tell!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

*Note that in the interim, between the time this post was written and revised, rumour has reached me that the new city-centre project has been shelved and when the House of Soviets goes, it is being replaced with parkland.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

See >>> Kaliningrad House of Soviets Melts into the Past<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"It's
Farewell old friend! The House of Soviets, Kaliningrad, Russia, 2021<\/span><\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Copyright \u00a9 2018-2024 Mick Hart. All rights reserved.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0420\u0435\u043f\u0435\u0442\u0438\u0442\u043e\u0440 \u0430\u043d\u0433\u043b\u0438\u0439\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u044f\u0437\u044b\u043a\u0430 \u0432 \u041a\u0430\u043b\u0438\u043d\u0438\u043d\u0433\u0440\u0430\u0434\u0435<\/a><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n